Legal Opinion
In re 1991 Pennsylvania Legislative Reapportionment Commission
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Decided May 1, 1992No. Nos. 190, 191, 194, 196, 197, 199, 200 and 201 E.D. Misc. Docket 1991, 49-54, 56 and 57 M.D. Misc. Docket 1991, and 124, 132-138 and 141 W.D. Misc. Docket 1991PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
2Per curiam
AND NOW, this 14th day of February, 1992, pursuant to Article 2, Section 17(d) of the Pennsylvania Constitution, this Court, after consideration of the objections raised in the above-captioned petitions, finds that the Final Plan of the 1991 Pennsylvania Legislative Reapportionment Commis*341sion is not contrary to law, and the Petitions for Review are denied.
The deadline of February 18, 1992 for filing of nominating petitions is hereby extended until the close of business hours on Friday, March 6, 1992.
It is further ordered that as to the nominating signatures acquired prior to the date of…
3Cases cited29 opinions
- Reynolds v. SimsSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Thornburg v. GinglesSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- City of Mobile v. BoldenSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- White v. RegesterSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Gaffney v. CummingsSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by30 opinions
- Larsen v. Senate Of The Commonwealth Of PennsylvaniaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1998
- League of Women Voters of PA v. CmwlthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
- Donatelli v. MitchellCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
- Erfer v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
- Banfield v. CortesCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.