Legal Opinion

Crabb v. Cole

Court of Appeals of Tennessee

Decided March 30, 1935PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCrownover, J.

The original bill in this cause was filed on October 4, 1933, by N. A. Crabb and wife, Willie Crabb, against Murel Cole, for the purpose of purging a note of usury and having an offset on account of said usury, and for injunction to restrain the foreclosure sale of their property mortgaged to secure said note.

Defendant answered and denied that he had charged usurious interest.

Complainants filed an amended and supplemental bill in which they calculated that the amount of their indebtedness on their notes, of which this $569.16 note is a renewal, with interest at the rate of 6 per cent., would…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Insurance Cos. v. ScalesTennessee Supreme Court · 1899
  2. Hinton v. Insurance Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1902
  3. Carpenter v. WrightTennessee Supreme Court · 1929
  4. Sahlien v. BankTennessee Supreme Court · 1891
  5. Newberry v. Hamblen CountyTennessee Supreme Court · 1928

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. TWB Architects, Inc. v. The Braxton, LLCTennessee Supreme Court · 2019
  2. Pacific Eastern Corp. v. Gulf Life Holding Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1995
  3. Draper v. DraperCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1940
  4. Burem v. HarvilleCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1943
  5. Lincoln County Bank v. MaddoxCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1937

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API