Legal Opinion

In Re Marriage of Janssen

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 22, 1975No. Civ. 44531PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

FLEMING, Acting P. J.

David Janssen appeals an order directing him to pay attorneys’ fees, accountants’ fees, and costs incurred by Ellie Janssen in post-judgment proceedings in the dissolution of their marriage. He contends the record fails to justify the order.

The appeal is on a settled statement which shows these facts:

On 27, 29 and 30 November and 3 December 1973 the trial court conducted a consolidated hearing on Elbe’s motion to hold David in contempt for failure to pay approximately $37,000 in spousal support during 1972 and 1973 and on David’s motion for modification of future…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Primm v. PrimmCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  2. In Re Marriage of LopezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
  3. In Re Marriage of MulhernCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
  4. Sigesmund v. SigesmundCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
  5. In Re Marriage of BorsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. In Re Marriage of AufmuthCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
  2. In Re Marriage of SullivanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Smith v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
  4. In Re Marriage of PopenhagerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
  5. In Re Marriage of MilhanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API