Legal Opinion
The Pennsylvania Railroad Company v. The Travelers Insurance Company
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided October 19, 1955No. 12355PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MARTIN, Circuit Judge.
The Pennsylvania Railroad Company has appealed from an order of the United States District Court adjudging that there is no legal obligation upon the Travelers Insurance Company, under a certain policy of insurance, to defend on behalf of the railroad company against claims asserted against the carrier by two of its employees, Cook and O’Hara. The order adjudged further that there is no duty or obligation upon the insurance company to pay, in whole or in part, any judgment that these two employees may recover against the railroad company for damages sustained by them…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Socony-Vacuum Oil Co. v. Continental Casualty Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1945
- Bobier v. National Casualty Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1944
- Bloom-Rosenblum-Kline Co. v. Union Indemnity Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1929
- London Guarantee & Accident Co. v. ShaferDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 1940
- Employers' Liability Assur. Corp. v. Accident & Casualty Ins.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1943
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, a Corporation v. Roy A. Bonwell, Shelton A. Mick, Samuel T. Shaffner and Willie Marie ShaffnerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1957
- Butler v. Maryland Casualty CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1956
- Ronald F. Burger v. Continental National American GroupCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1971
- Home Indemnity Co., New York v. LechnerDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1961
- Bituminous Casualty Corporation v. Horn Lumber CompanyDistrict Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1968
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.