Home Indemnity Co., New York v. Lechner
District Court, S.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
WEINBERGER, District Judge.
The amended complaint for declaratory relief states that a controversy exists between plaintiff and defendants herein as to plaintiff’s duties and obligations under a certain insurance policy, as to whether Roy A. Lechner, a minor, or his parents are insureds under the policy, and whether plaintiff has any duty to provide .the Lechners with a defense in a certain Superior Court action, or to pay any judgment that might be rendered against them in said action.
The policy involved was issued by the plaintiff to Will and Ann Love, and insured their automobile.
The…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Maryland Casualty Co. v. Pacific Coal & Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Brillhart v. Excess Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. QuarlesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1937
- Maryland Casualty Co. v. Consumers Finance Service, Inc. of PennsylvaniaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1938
- H. J. Heinz Co. v. OwensCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1951
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Exchange Casualty & Surety Co. v. ScottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
- Travelers Insurance Company v. Marjorie DavisCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1974
- General of America Ins. Co. v. LillyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
- Allstate Insurance Co. v. Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1962
- New York Central Railroad Co. v. Colonial Stores, Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 1971
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.