State v. Martin

¶ 1. Defendant George Dean Martin appeals from the district court’s imposition of sentence following remand in his partially successful appeal of his convictions for boating while intoxicated. He contends that the district court lacked authority to impose the sentence and that his federal constitutional rights were violated by the new sentence and by the court’s application of certain good-time credits to his sentence. We affirm.

¶2. The facts underlying defendant’s conviction are set out in full in this Court’s opinion in his first appeal. See generally State v. Martin, 2007 VT 96, 182 Vt.…