Legal Opinion

State v. Wilder

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided February 26, 2010No. 08-134 & 08-349PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDooley, J.

¶ 1. Following a joint trial, defendants Lonny Campbell and Christopher Wilder were each convicted of sexual assault, aggravated sexual assault, and furnishing alcohol to a minor. Defendants challenge their aggravated sexual assault convictions, arguing that there was insufficient evidence to show that they “joined or assisted” the other’s sexual assault under 13 V.S.A. § 3253(a)(2), and that the jury’s verdicts are legally inconsistent. We do not reach defendants’ arguments because we find a defect in the information underlying the second count of aggravated sexual assault that we must…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. State v. BaconSupreme Court of Vermont · 1995
  2. State v. DavignonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1989
  3. State v. MillerSupreme Court of Vermont · 1985
  4. State v. PolkSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
  5. State v. DennisCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1986

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In re Cherie HydeSupreme Court of Vermont · 2015
  2. State v. WilderSupreme Court of Vermont · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API