State v. Wilder
Supreme Court of Vermont
1Opinion of the CourtDooley, J.
¶ 1. Following a joint trial, defendants Lonny Campbell and Christopher Wilder were each convicted of sexual assault, aggravated sexual assault, and furnishing alcohol to a minor. Defendants challenge their aggravated sexual assault convictions, arguing that there was insufficient evidence to show that they “joined or assisted” the other’s sexual assault under 13 V.S.A. § 3253(a)(2), and that the jury’s verdicts are legally inconsistent. We do not reach defendants’ arguments because we find a defect in the information underlying the second count of aggravated sexual assault that we must…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- State v. BaconSupreme Court of Vermont · 1995
- State v. DavignonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1989
- State v. MillerSupreme Court of Vermont · 1985
- State v. PolkSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
- State v. DennisCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1986
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- In re Cherie HydeSupreme Court of Vermont · 2015
- State v. WilderSupreme Court of Vermont · 2010