Legal Opinion
Buttinghausen v. Rappeport
New Jersey Court of Chancery
Decided March 9, 1942No. Docket 124/492PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
On July 30th, 1938, complainant purchased from Sonnell Motors, Inc., a used automobile for a present consideration of $595. It is the custom of the automobile trade for the dealer, on behalf of the purchaser of a car, to submit to the Commissioner of Motor Vehicles the title papers, pay the filing fee (R.S. 39:10-11), and have the registration plates transferred to the new car (R.S. 39:3-30). But it happened that complainant bought the car on a Saturday after the motor vehicle agent's office was closed. So Miller, president of Sonnell Motors, the man with whom complainant was dealing,…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Worrall v. . MunnNew York Court of Appeals · 1868
- Lombardi v. LaudatiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1938
- McVoy v. BaumannNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1922
- Krah v. WassmerNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1908
- Keator v. BrownNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1899
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Jeffrey Mort Pamela Mort Fred Strefling Jeffrey Tobian v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
- Loiselle v. COSAS MANAGEMENT GROUP, LLCCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2010
- McNorton v. Pan American Bank of OrlandoDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1980
- Martin v. NagerNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1983
- Cunningham v. Camelot Motors, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1975
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.