Legal Opinion

Dwinnell v. Duluth, South Shore & Atlantic Railway Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 3, 1928No. Docket No. 111PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPotter, J.

Plaintiffs, as trustees of the Northwestern Leather Company, brought suit against the Duluth, South Shore & Atlantic Railway Company, defendant, to recover the value of certain leather alleged by plaintiffs to have been shipped to the Northwestern Leather Company at Boston from Sault Ste. Marie, Michigan. The leather was loaded by plaintiffs at their tannery in Sault Ste. Marie and receipted for by the defendant’s local agent. The bill of lading contained the language “Shipper’s load and count.”

Section 21 of the bill of lading act of August 29, 1916 (39 U. S. Stat. p. 541), provides, among…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. Modern Tool Corp. v. Pennsylvania R. Co.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1951
  2. C. Itoh & Co. (America), Inc. v. M/V Hans LeonhardtDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1989
  3. Chicago & N. W. Ry. Co. v. Stephens Nat. Bank of FremontCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1935
  4. Boatmen's Nat. Bank of St. Louis v. St. Louis Southwestern Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1935
  5. Southern Pacific Co. v. Builders Hardware, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1964

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API