Legal Opinion

Tripp Giant Leveller Co. v. Bresnahan

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts

Decided December 9, 1895PublishedCited by 2 opinions

This was a bill in equity by the Trip]) Giant Leveller Company against Morris V. Iírosnaban and others for alleged infringement of a patent. The cause was heard upon a motion for a preliminary injunction.

1Opinion of the Court

COLT, Circuit Judge.

The Gutcheon patent, No. 384,893, now in suit, which has been assigned to the complainant, is for an improvement in machines for heating out the soles of boots and shoes. The first and third claims of the patent were held to be valid in Cutcheon v. Herrick, 52 Fed. 147. This decision was affirmed by the circuit court of appeals, in Herrick v. Leveller Co., 8 C. C. A. 475, 60 Fed. 80. Subsequently the patent came before the court again for consideration in five cases, which were heard together. 61 Fed. 289. One of these cases was against the present defendant Bresnalian. In…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Herrick v. Tripp Giant Leveller Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1893
  2. Cutcheon v. HerrickU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · 1892
  3. Tripp Giant Leveler Co. v. RogersDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1894

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Bresnahan v. Tripp Giant Leveller Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1900
  2. Tripp Giant Leveller Co. v. BresnahanU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · 1899

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API