Thorson v. Billy Graham Evangelistic Ass'n
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WRIGHT, Judge.
Appellant brought an employment-discrimination action under the Minnesota Human Rights Act (MHRA), alleging that respondent terminated her employment on the basis of her sexual orientation. The district court granted respondent’s motion for summary judgment, finding respondent exempt from the sexual-orientation provisions of the MHRA because it is a nonprofit religious association not engaged in a secular business activity. We affirm.
FACTS
Respondent Billy Graham Evangelistic Association (BGEA) promotes Christianity through a combination of five events, productions for…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Thiele v. StichSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- State Ex Rel. Cooper v. FrenchSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
- Fabio v. BellomoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1993
- Mrs. Billie B. McCLURE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. the SALVATION ARMY, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1972
- Lefto v. Hoggsbreath Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1998
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Doe v. Lutheran High School of Greater MinneapolisCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2005
- Horodenski v. Lyndale Green Townhome Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2011