Legal Opinion · Dissent

McClure v. Maass

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided April 4, 1989No. TC 87-C-10178; CA A48629; SC S35870PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1DissentLinde, J.

Petitioner sought post-conviction review of the judgment and sentence upon his conviction of several felonies. He previously had appealed and thereafter unsuccessfully sought post-conviction relief. In this second petition for post-conviction relief, petitioner alleges inadequate representation by his trial and appellate counsel. The circuit court dismissed the petition on grounds that it had “no jurisdiction to hear the present petition,” citing ORS 138.550(3).1 The Court of Appeals affirmed the judgment of dismissal without an opinion.

Although the petition for post-conviction relief did not…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Church v. GladdenOregon Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Page v. CuppCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1986
  3. Hetrick v. KeeneyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1986
  4. Hetrick v. KeeneyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1986

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. McClure v. MaassCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API