Legal Opinion
Starr v. Govatos
Superior Court of Delaware
Decided July 13, 1925No. Replevin, No. 80PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Rice, J.,
delivering the opinion of the Court:
The following agreed statement of facts was filed in this case:
“1. March 1, 1922, a certain partnership, Heimbach & Brinkman, sold Lyman W. Medes, at Camden, New Jersey, a Maxwell touring car for nine hundred eighty-five dollars (§985.00) subject to the conditions of a contract of conditional sale attached hereto, marked Exhibit A; that said contract was recorded in the office of the Register of Deeds at Camden, New Jersey, on March 6, 1922.
“2. The Uniform Conditional Sales Act is and was in force in New Jersey at the time of the making of said…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Continental Guaranty Corp. v. Peoples Bus LineSuperior Court of Delaware · 1922
- Truax v. ParvisSuperior Court of Delaware · 1886
- Staunton v. SmithSuperior Court of Delaware · 1906
- Flint Wagon Works v. MaloneySuperior Court of Delaware · 1911
- South Bend Iron Works v. ReedySuperior Court of Delaware · 1905
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Stasch v. Underwater Works, Inc.Superior Court of Delaware · 1960
- Truitt v. Patten, SheriffUtah Supreme Court · 1930
- E. L. Jones & Co. v. UnruhSuperior Court of Delaware · 1935
- In re SmithDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1927
- Universal Credit Co. v. SpinazzoloSuperior Court of Delaware · 1938
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.