E. L. Jones & Co. v. Unruh
Superior Court of Delaware
1Opinion of the Court
Rodney, J.,
delivering the opinion of the Court:
The petitions present several interesting questions. First, has a conditional vendee such an interest in the chattel covered by the conditional sale contract as to subject it to an attachment or levy at the instance of his creditor? It may be conceded that the great weight of authority is to the effect that, at common law, the vendee had no such interest, though the reasons for these decisions are far from satisfactory. It has been determined in a number of cases that, at common law, until the vendee had complied with the condition of payment of…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Baker v. HullNew York Court of Appeals · 1929
- Continental Guaranty Corp. v. Peoples Bus LineSuperior Court of Delaware · 1922
- Carolina, Clinchfield & Ohio Railroad v. Unaka Springs Lumber Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1914
- Dame v. C. H. Hanson & Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1912
- Robinson v. BirdMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1893
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Stasch v. Underwater Works, Inc.Superior Court of Delaware · 1960
- Computer Sciences Corp. v. SCI-TEK, INCORPORATEDSuperior Court of Delaware · 1976
- In re ElkinsDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1941
- Universal Credit Co. v. SpinazzoloSuperior Court of Delaware · 1938
- Sachs v. SachsDistrict Court, Virgin Islands · 1958