Legal Opinion

In re Persky

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 24, 1983PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

2Per curiam

Respondent has moved for an order confirming the July 9, 1979 report of the Committee on Character and Fitness and reinstating him as an attorney.

*373Respondent was admitted to practice on January 20, 1953 in the First Department. He was suspended by this court for two years, effective December 15,1975, because of his conviction of four counts of filing a false statement with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

This is his fourth application for reinstatement. He previously applied to this court on December 16, 1977, December 30, 1978, and January 18, 1982. All three…

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In re BiaggiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
  2. In re PerskyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
  3. In re PerskyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API