Legal Opinion

In re Persky

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 26, 1983Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

2Per curiam

Michael Gentile, chief counsel to the Departmental Disciplinary Committee, has moved for an order recalling and reconsidering this court’s order of March 24, 1983, which reinstated respondent as an attorney (92 AD2d 372).

*24Movant claims that the majority erroneously held that this court is bound by the decision of the Committee on Grievances, now the Departmental Disciplinary Committee, to reprimand respondent without referring the matter to this court for further sanctions, in a proceeding involving respondent’s conduct in the Newburger, Loeb matter.

We noted that respondent…

3Cases cited1 opinion

  1. In re PerskyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API