Legal Opinion · Dissent

In re Persky

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 26, 1983Published

1Dissent

Murphy, P. J. (dissenting).

By order entered March 24, 1983, respondent Persky was reinstated as an attorney upon a decision by the majority who held, in part, that misconduct by Persky for which he had been reprimanded in 1978 by the Committee on Grievances of the Association of the Bar of the City of New York could not be considered by this court upon Persky’s application for reinstatement. The majority stated that Persky had not challenged the reprimand by demanding the commencement of a disciplinary proceeding against him, and the committee, in reprimanding Persky, had not recommended to…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Wiener v. WeintraubNew York Court of Appeals · 1968
  2. In re PerskyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API