Legal Opinion
United States v. Cameron Patterson
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided June 14, 2016No. 15-3022PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BAUER, Circuit Judge.
Miranda warnings have taken a foothold in American culture largely via crime drama television and film. Defendant-appellant, Cameron E. Patterson, argues Federal Bureau of Investigation agents violated his Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination when they failed to give him Miranda warnings prior to interviewing him. The sole issue is whether Patterson was “in custody” when he made his incriminating statements, thereby implicating the Fifth Amendment and necessitating Miranda warnings. We find Patterson was not in custody for purposes of Miranda, and therefore…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Berkemer v. McCartySupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Yarborough v. AlvaradoSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Oregon v. MathiasonSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Howes v. FieldsSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- United States v. Bradley CoxCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2022
- United States v. CoulterCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2022
- United States v. Jorge LealCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2021
- United States v. Matthew Higgins-VogtCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2018
- DeWitt v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2017
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.