Legal Opinion
Moore v. State Board of Control
California Court of Appeal
Decided September 30, 2003No. C031821PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
SCOTLAND, P. J.
The Legislature has declared that it is in the public interest to assist residents of California in obtaining restitution for the pecuniary losses they suffer as a direct result of criminal acts. (Gov. Code, § 13950.) To this end, the Legislature established the Restitution Fund, formerly known as the Indemnity Fund, and enacted procedures by which crime victims may obtain compensation from the fund. (Gov. Code, § 13950 et seq.; further section references are to the Government Code unless otherwise specified.) A crime victim commences the process by filing an application…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- White v. Ultramar, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1999
- Driscoll v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
- Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
- DiGenova v. State Board of EducationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
- Western Security Bank v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Feduniak v. California Coastal CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
- Quarry v. Doe ICalifornia Supreme Court · 2012
- Brenton v. Metabolife International, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2004
- Aguilera v. HeimanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
- NILES FREEMAN EQUIPMENT v. JosephCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.