Legal Opinion

Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Schnackenberg

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided May 25, 1937No. Nos. 6076, 6077PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

LINDLEY, District Judge.

The question presented by these two petitions to review decisions of the Board of Tax Appeals is whether the salary and compensation of the taxpayer, as general attorney for the South Park commissioners of Chicago, is a part of his taxable income. The answer depends upon, (1), whether thé park commissioners, as a political subdivision of the state of Illinois, are engaged in the exercise of governmental functions; (2), whether the taxpayer is an officer of a subdivision of the state, or an independent contractor, and (3), whether there is any legal distinction between…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Metcalf & Eddy v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. Shoemaker v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  3. Helvering v. PowersSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  4. Brush v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
  5. New York Ex Rel. Rogers v. GravesSupreme Court of the United States · 1937

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. De LeuwCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API