Boyster v. Shoemake
Court of Appeals of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
Wendell L. Griffen, Judge.
On April 23, 2007, the Sebastian County Circuit Court entered an order finding that appellee Teresa Shoemake presented proof of a boundary line by acquiescence between property belonging to her and appellant James Boyster. Appellant asserts that the circuit court clearly erred in making that finding, contending that appellee failed to prove that there was any mutual assent in establishing the boundary fine. We affirm, holding that the circuit court did not clearly err in finding that appellee presented sufficient evidence of mutual recognition of a boundary fine by…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Jennings v. BurfordCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1997
- Petrus v. Nature ConservancySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1997
- Rabjohn v. AshcraftSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1972
- Robertson v. LeesCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2004
- Warren v. CollierSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1978
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Chiodini v. LockCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2010
- Reynolds v. GFM, LLCCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2013
- Stadler v. WarrenCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2012
- Thurlkill v. WoodCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2010
- Whitecotton v. OwenCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2016
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.