Legal Opinion

Davis v. Knoxville

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided October 17, 1891PublishedCited by 16 opinions

PROM KNOX. Appeal in error from Circuit Court of Knox County. A. G-. Howe, Sp. J.

1Opinion of the CourtLurtost, J.

Appellant Davis sued tlie city of Knoxville to recover damages for an assault made on him while confined in the city calaboose on a charge of drunkenness, by prisoners confined with him in the same room. The case was submitted to a jury, who, under a very perspicuous charge by special Judge Howe, returned a verdict for the defendant.

The negligence charged may be summarized as follows:

First. — That the city calaboose was not sufficiently commodious to permit a separation of prisoners with some regard to character of inmates and grade of offense.

Second. — That there were three rooms in the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. City of Richmond v. Long's Adm'rsSupreme Court of Virginia · 1867
  2. Dargan v. Mayor of MobileSupreme Court of Alabama · 1858
  3. McElroy v. City CouncilSupreme Court of Georgia · 1880

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Mayor of Nashville v. BurnsTennessee Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Bricker v. SimsTennessee Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Coffman v. City of PulaskiTennessee Supreme Court · 1967
  4. Stocker v. City of NashvilleTennessee Supreme Court · 1939
  5. Carty's Admr. v. Village of WinooskiSupreme Court of Vermont · 1905

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API