Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Bunting Plastic Surgery Clinic

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided August 20, 1993No. 1920521PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Bunting Plastic Surgery Clinic, P.C., formerly doing business as Aesthetic and Plastic Surgery Clinic ("Bunting Surgery"), sued Emmett E. Tucker, Jr., and his former wife, Donna K. Tucker, to collect for medical services rendered to Donna in 1988 while she was married to Emmett. The action was based on a contract executed by Donna wherein she promised to pay for the services. Emmett did not sign this contract; Bunting Surgery sued him under the common law doctrine of necessaries, which required that a husband furnish his wife with "medical and hospital treatment for her cure and comfort…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Chevron Oil Co. v. HusonSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Emanuel v. McGriffSupreme Court of Alabama · 1992
  3. Mount v. Baptist Hospital of Gadsden, Inc.Alabama Court of Appeals · 1966
  4. Green v. First National Bank of TuskaloosaCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1971
  5. Green v. First National Bank of TuskaloosaSupreme Court of Alabama · 1972

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Smith v. SchulteSupreme Court of Alabama · 1995
  2. McCool v. Morgan County CommissionCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1997
  3. CUSTARD INS. ADJUSTERS v. YoungbloodSupreme Court of Alabama · 1996
  4. CUSTARD INS. ADJUSTERS v. YoungbloodSupreme Court of Alabama · 1996
  5. Ex Parte Bunting Plastic Surgery ClinicSupreme Court of Alabama · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API