Legal Opinion

Otis v. Anoka-Hennepin School District No. 11

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided June 13, 2000No. C5-99-2064PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

PETERSON, Judge

Appellants Donald H. Otis and his wife sued respondent Anoka-Hennepin Independent School District No. 11 for negligence after Otis slipped on an icy sidewalk in front of a school and was injured. The school district was granted summary judgment based on the “mere slipperiness” rule. In this appeal from the summary judgment, Otis argues that the “mere slipperiness” rule does not apply because the ice on the sidewalk was caused by an artificial condition created by the school district. We affirm.

FACTS

Otis went to swim at a swimming pool in a school that is owned and…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Offerdahl v. University of Minnesota Hospitals & ClinicsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
  2. Henkes v. City of MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1890
  3. Nichols v. Village of BuhlSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1922
  4. Doyle v. City of RosevilleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1994
  5. Freeman v. Village of HibbingSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1926

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Fast v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Fast v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Rodenwald v. State Department of Natural ResourcesCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API