Legal Opinion
Freeman v. Village of Hibbing
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided December 17, 1926No. 25,599PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the CourtDibell, J.
Action to recover damages sustained by the plaintiff on November 24, 1923, when she slipped and fell on a sidewalk in Hibbing. The action was dismissed at the close of the plaintiff’s testimony. She appeals from the order denying her motion for a new trial.
The allegations of the complaint are that defendant negligently allowed snow, ice and rubbish to accumulate on the sidewalk creating an “uneven, ridged and slippery” condition. The pleader’s purpose was to bring the case within such cases as Henkes v. City of Minneapolis, 42 Minn. 530, 44 N. W. 1026; Wright v. City of St. Cloud, 54 Minn.…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Wright v. City of St. CloudSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1893
- Henkes v. City of MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1890
- Gracz v. AndersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1908
- Miller v. City of St. PaulSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1888
- McHugh v. City of St. PaulSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1897
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Otis v. Anoka-Hennepin School District No. 11Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2000