Woodbine Auto, Inc. v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
JOYNER, District Judge.
Defendants National Railroad Passenger Corporation (“AMTRAK”) and the City of Philadelphia now move for the entry of summary judgment in their favor on all of the plaintiffs claims against them. For the reasons which follow, the motions must be denied.
Background
In the late afternoon and early evening hours on July 14, 1994, the greater Philadelphia area experienced a series of severe thunderstorms accompanied by high winds and heavy rain. In the course of these storms, the plaintiffs’ real and personal property located at 2161-2171 North 62nd Street…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Mascaro v. Youth Study CenterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- White's AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
- Liberty Lobby, Inc. v. Dow Jones & Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1988
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Rooney v. City of PhiladelphiaDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2009
- AMERICAN RIVER TRANS. v. Paragon Marine ServicesDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 2002
- Crowley v. CostaDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2013
- Phoenix Lithographing Corp. v. Bind Rite Services, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2014
- WOODBINE AUTO v. Southeastern Pa. Transp. Auth.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1998