Legal Opinion
Canteen v. Smith
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided May 14, 2008No. 05 Civ. 4580 (KMW)(DFE)PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
KIMBA M. WOOD, District Judge:
Petitioner Arthur Canteen (“Petitioner”) brings this pro se petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (“Section 2254”). Petitioner asserts that: (1) certain statements he made to the police should have been suppressed because they were made involuntarily (the “Involuntary Statement Claim”); (2) he was prejudiced when he was precluded from cross-examining a government witness concerning her arrest (the “Right to Cross-Examine Claim”); (3) the indictment was defective (the “Defective Indictment Claim”); (4) the trial court…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Thomas v. ArnSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Coleman v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Murray v. CarrierSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Stone v. PowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Bell v. ErcoleDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2009
- Fernandez v. SmithDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2008
- Nunez v. ConwayDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2013
- Baez v. RoyceDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2024
- Rodriguez v. CapraDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2023
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.