Disabatino & Raniere, Inc. v. Gilmore
Superior Court of Delaware
1Opinion of the Court
Additional facts appear in the Court’s opinion.
Carey, J.:
The sole question for decision is whether, under the facts of this case, defendant was entitled to have the jury determine whether or not Raniere had a last clear chance to avoid the accident. At the time of trial, I thought not, and I am still of the same opinion.
The jury’s verdict necessarily constituted a finding either that neither driver was negligent or that both of them were negligent. If neither was negligent, the theory of last clear chance has no application. If both were negligent, the doctrine could be invoked by Gilmore…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Island Express, Inc. v. FrederickSupreme Court of Delaware · 1934
- Folger v. Richfield Oil Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1947
- Vaughan v. OatesWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1946
- Tompkins v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadSuperior Court of Delaware · 1951
- Schoen v. Western Union Telegraph Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1943
3Cited by5 opinions
- McGraw v. CorrinSupreme Court of Delaware · 1973
- McGahey v. SwinehartSuperior Court of Delaware · 1970
- Crouse v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1955
- McLenaghan v. BillowDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1958
- Townsend v. WiseDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1978