Legal Opinion

(HC) Cunningham v. Warden

District Court, E.D. California

Decided August 26, 2025No. 1:25-cv-00180Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 AARON JOSEPH CUNNINGHAM, No. 1:25-cv-00180-KES-SKO (HC) 12 Petitioner, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS, GRANTING 13 RESPONDENT’S MOTION TO DISMISS, DISMISSING PETITION FOR WRIT OF 14 v. HABEAS CORPUS WITHOUT PREJUDICE, AND DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO 15 ENTER JUDGMENT AND CLOSE CASE 16 WARDEN, FCI-MENDOTA, Docs. 19, 20 17 Respondent. 18 19 20 Petitioner Aaron Joseph Cunningham is a federal prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma 21 pauperis with a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Anthony Ojo v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1997
  2. Stephen Charles FORDE, Petitioner-Appellant, v. U.S. PAROLE COMMISSION, Respondent-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
  3. CITY OF OAKLAND, CAL. v. Hotels. Com LPCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  4. Robert Moates v. P. Rademacher, K. McQueenCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API