Legal Opinion

Carl Rose & Sons Ready Mix Concrete, Inc. v. Thorp Sales Corp.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided August 18, 1976No. 7623SC46PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PARKER, Judge.

“For a court to give a valid judgment against a defendant, it is essential that jurisdiction of the party has been obtained by the court in some way allowed by law. When a court has no authority to act, its acts are void.” Russell v. Manufacturing Co., 266 N.C. 531, 534, 146 S.E. 2d 459, 461 (1966). The contents required in a summons are set out in G.S. 1A-1, Rule 4(b), and one of the essential requirements is that the summons “shall be directed to the defendant or defendants and shall notify each defendant to appear and answer.” The summons issued in the present case fails to…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Plemmons v. Southern Improvement Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1891
  2. Philpott v. KernsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
  3. CAROLINA PLYWOOD DISTRIBUTORS, INC. v. McAndrewsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  4. Russell v. BEA STAPLE MANUFACTURING COMPANYSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Wiles v. Welparnel Const. Co., Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
  2. Southern Athletic/Bike v. House of Sports, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
  3. Wiles v. Welparnel Const. Co., Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1977
  4. Washington v. ClineCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2013
  5. Jones v. SummersCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API