Russell v. BEA STAPLE MANUFACTURING COMPANY
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtParker, J.
G.S. 1-89 reads in relevant part: “It [the summons] must be returnable before the clerk and must command the sheriff or other proper officers to summon the defendant, or defendants, to appear and answer the complaint of the plaintiffs within thirty (30) days after its service upon defendant, or defendants. . . .” (Emphasis ours.)
The original summons commanded the sheriff “to summon Clayton Eddinger, Kearns Warehouse, 518 Hamilton Street, High Point, North Carolina, local agent for Bea Staple Manufacturing Company, Incorporated, defendant(s) above named,” and was so served. The copy of the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- City of Monroe v. NivenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
- Harrington v. RiceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
- Plemmons v. Southern Improvement Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1891
- Hogsed v. . PearlmanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
- Jones v. . VanstorySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Wiles v. Welparnel Const. Co., Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
- CAROLINA PLYWOOD DISTRIBUTORS, INC. v. McAndrewsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
- Robert Yale, Ancillary Administrator of the Estate of Joseph Dudley Schofield, Deceased v. National Indemnity CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1979
- Ross v. Richland CountySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1978
- Southern Athletic/Bike v. House of Sports, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.