Legal Opinion

Commonwealth Oil Co. v. Turk

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided March 14, 1928No. 20647PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJ ones, J.

The case filed in the municipal court of Cleveland was one sounding in chancery, and under Sections 1579-6, 1579-7, and 1579-9, General Code, jurisdiction to hear it was conferred upon the municipal court. The appeal filed in the Court of Appeals was evidently dismissed for the reason that it was unahle to find any law of the state giving the right of appeal from the municipal court to the Court of Appeals, or providing a procedure for perr fecting such appeal.

The sole question to be determined is whether an appeal may be perfected from the municipal court to the Court of Appeals.

Section 6,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Griffiths v. PowersMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1913

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Hoffman v. KnollmanOhio Supreme Court · 1939
  2. Squire, Supt. v. BatesOhio Supreme Court · 1936
  3. Krotine v. LinkOhio Court of Appeals · 1930
  4. Daily, Admr. v. DowtyOhio Court of Appeals · 1936
  5. Toth v. State, Board of ReviewOhio Court of Appeals · 1962

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API