Legal Opinion
United States v. Jose Guadalupe Jimenez-Villasenor, Also Known as "Grenas," United States of America v. Alejandro Flores-Romero
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided November 2, 2001No. 01-1021, 01-1350PublishedCited by 59 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BYE, Circuit Judge.
In the wake of a ten day trial, Guadalupe Jimenez-Villasenor a/k/a “Greñas” and Alejandro Flores-Romero a/k/a “Alex” were both convicted of conspiracy to distribute controlled substances in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846. Jimenez-Villasenor appeals his conviction only, specifically challenging the sufficiency of the evidence. Flores-Romero appeals both his conviction and sentence. With respect to his conviction, Flores-Romero argues that the district court 1 clearly erred in finding that he was competent to stand trial. With respect to his sentence, Flores-Romero argues that…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Dusky v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- United States v. James P. ShoffnerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1995
- United States v. Shannon Wayne Agofsky, United States of America v. Joseph Anthony AgofskyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1994
- United States v. Gregory Jacen SykesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1992
- United States v. John D. BehlerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1994
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by59 opinions
- United States v. Eddie Louis DentonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2006
- United States v. Jeffrey H. CollinsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2003
- United States v. Travis ZiesmanCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2005
- United States of America, Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Kevin Lee Davis, Appellant/cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2006
- United States v. Rolon-RamosCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2007
54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.