Legal Opinion

State v. Wooten

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided June 28, 1972No. 726SC120Published

1Opinion of the Court

VAUGHN, Judge.

Defendant first assigns as error the asking of certain questions of the defendant by the trial judge which questions, defendant contends, were prejudicial to defendant and in violation of G.S. 1-180. “It is well settled in this State that the trial judge can ask questions of a witness in order to obtain a proper understanding and clarification of the witness’ testimony.” State v. Strickland, 254 N.C. 658, 119 S.E. 2d 781; see also, State v. Blalock, 9 N.C. App. 94, 175 S.E. 2d 716. It has also been stated, in State v. Perry, 231 N.C. 467, 57 S.E. 2d 774, that, “The comment made…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. ColsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  2. State v. SneedenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  3. State v. PerrySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
  4. State v. McNeilSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
  5. State v. StricklandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API