Legal Opinion
Theodore A. George v. W.A. Perrill, Warden, Fci--Englewood United States Parole Commission
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided August 7, 1995No. 94-1597PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SEYMOUR, Chief Judge.
Theodore George brought this habeas corpus petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 alleging that his sentence is illegal under the Ex Post Facto Clause, that the Parole Commission abused its discretion in promulgating the regulations governing revocation of parole, and that he is being falsely imprisoned by the Commission’s application of those regulations. The district court dismissed the petition, holding that Mr. George was abusing the writ by raising the same issues that he unsuccessfully asserted in a previous section 2241 action. Mr. George appeals and we affirm. 1
In his…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Schlup v. DeloSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Hall v. BellmonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
- McCleskey v. ZantSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Sanders v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Price v. JohnstonSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Sustache-Rivera v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2000
- Raniel Perez Zayas v. Immigration & Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2002
- Stanko v. DavisCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2010
- Ackerman v. NovakCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2007
- Robert J. Haley v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.