Legal Opinion

Chamberlin v. Jones

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided March 24, 1888No. 13,158PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMitchell, C. J.

The complaint in this case is encumbered with useless extraneous matter, to such an extent as to render obscure and uncertain the real theory upon which it proceeds. Eliminating immaterial averments and unnecessary verbiage, the following appear to be the material facts: In July, 1884, Parrott & Co. were partners trading as merchants, and the owners of a stock of goods worth $1,500. They were indebted to Jones, McKee'& Co., for goods sold and delivered, to the amount of $458.76. The debt was evidenced by four promissory notes. Intending to cheát and defraud their creditors, and to prevent the…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Murtha v. . CurleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1882
  2. Gilbert v. McCorkleIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  3. Ferguson v. HillmanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1882
  4. Seymour v. . WilsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1859
  5. Farlin v. SookSupreme Court of Kansas · 1883

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Phelps v. SmithIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
  2. Central Improvement Co. v. Cambria Steel Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1913
  3. Doherty v. HollidayIndiana Supreme Court · 1892
  4. Coale v. Moline Plow Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1890
  5. Darby v. VinnedgeIndiana Court of Appeals · 1913

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API