Legal Opinion

In re Mendy

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided February 17, 2012No. 2011-B-2275PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.*

h This disciplinary matter arises from formal charges filed by the Office of Disciplinary Counsel (“ODC”) against respondent, Edward Bissau Mendy, an attorney licensed to practice law in Louisiana.

UNDERLYING FACTS

09-DB-053

Count I — The Tucker Matter

In February 2003, Michelle Tucker retained respondent to prepare income tax returns and negotiate a settlement with the IRS on her behalf. She paid respondent $2,000 of a $5,000 flat fee, and agreed to pay the balance upon completion and processing of an offer in compromise. Respondent subsequently participated in a conference call with…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Louisiana State Bar Ass'n v. WhittingtonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1984
  2. Louisiana State Bar Ass'n v. ReisSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1987
  3. In Re CaulfieldSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1996
  4. In Re PardueSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1994
  5. In Re BanksSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2009

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In Re: Edward Bissau MendySupreme Court of Louisiana · 2016
  2. Edward Bissau Mendy v. Joshua Grant Copeland, ET. AL.District Court, N.D. Mississippi · 2026
  3. Mendy v. PendletonDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API