Legal Opinion

Edward Bissau Mendy v. Joshua Grant Copeland, ET. AL.

District Court, N.D. Mississippi

Decided July 6, 2026No. 3:25-cv-00015Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI OXFORD DIVISION EDWARD BISSAU MENDY PLAINTIFF v. CIVIL ACTION NO.: 3:25-cv-15-MPM-JMV JOSHUA GRANT COPELAND, ET. AL. DEFENDANTS ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION [DOC. 150] This matter is before the Court on the motion of the in forma pauperis pro se Plaintiff,1 who is seeking what he describes as “Protective and Evidentiary Relief Concerning Recommended Diagnostic Imaging and Financial Inability to Obtain Further Treatment by Edward Bissau Mendy.”” [Doc. 150]. As discussed below, the motion seeks, in advance of trial…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In re MendySupreme Court of Louisiana · 2001
  2. In Re: Edward Bissau MendySupreme Court of Louisiana · 2016
  3. In re MendySupreme Court of Louisiana · 2012
  4. In re MendySupreme Court of Louisiana · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API