Legal Opinion

Smith v. Albritton

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided February 26, 1923No. 23775PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtO’Niell, C. J.

Two of these cases, Smith v. Albritton and Wemple v. Albritton, were originally actions for slander of the title of lands occupied by Smith and Wemple, respectively. 'The two other cases, Giauque v. Albritton and Frost-Johnson Lumber Co. v. Albritton, were brought to test the title to lands claimed by the plaintiffs, respectively, and by the defendant, but not occupied or possessed by either party. Such suits are authorized by the Act 38 of 1908. In answer to the suits of Smith and Wemple, the defendant asserted title to the land, converting each suit into a petitory action. The four cases…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Wright v. RoseberrySupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  2. French v. FyanSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  3. Rogers Locomotive MacHine Works v. American Emigrant Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1896
  4. Ehrhardt v. HogaboomSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
  5. Little v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1913

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Clark v. Tensas Delta Land Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1931
  2. State Ex Rel. Hyams' Heirs v. GraceSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1931
  3. Safford v. AlbrittonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1926
  4. Lebleu v. HanszenSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1944
  5. Trahan v. FranklandLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1975

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API