Legal Opinion

Little v. Williams

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided December 1, 1913No. 8PublishedCited by 37 opinions

ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OP THE STATE OP ARKANSAS. The facts, which involve the construction of the SwampLand Act of 1850 and the title to certain lands in Arkansas, are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Van Devanter

This was a suit to quiet the title to about 1,200 acres of land in Mississippi County, in the State of Arkansas, lying within the meander line of what was represented on the plats of the United States survey as Walker’s lake. The plaintiff claimed title through (a) the act of Congress of September 28, 1850, 9 Stat. 519, c. 84, granting swamp and overflowed lands to the State, (b) an act of the state legislature in 1893 (Laws Ark. 1893, p. 172) granting to the St. Francis Levee District “all the lands of this State” lying within that district, and (c) a deed of March 11, 1903, from the levee…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Michigan Land & Lumber Co. v. RustSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  2. Niles v. Cedar Point ClubSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
  3. Brown v. HitchcockSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
  4. Rogers Locomotive MacHine Works v. American Emigrant Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1896
  5. French-Glenn Live Stock Co. v. SpringerSupreme Court of the United States · 1902

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. Martin v. Dade Muck Land Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1928
  2. Work v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  3. Chapman & Dewey Lumber Co. v. St. Francis Levee DistrictSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  4. Franzen v. Southern Surety Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1926
  5. Holmberg v. Hardee TrusteesSupreme Court of Florida · 1925

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API