Ehrhardt v. Hogaboom
Supreme Court of the United States
IN ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OE THE STATE OE CALIFORNIA. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Field
This is an action for the possession of a, tract of land in Sacramento -County, California, designated as the northeast quarter of section six of a certain township, which is described. The plaintiff- below, the defendant in error here, deraigns her title, through a patent of the United States embracing the demanded premises bearing date June 10, 18Y5, issued to one Elkanah Baldwin, a settler under the pre-emption laws, and his conveyance to her of the land patented to him. On the trial the patent and the conveyance to the plaintiff were produced and given in evidence. The defendant thereupon…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- French v. FyanSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
3Cited by44 opinions
- Noble v. Union River Logging RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Lux v. HagginCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
- Burke v. Southern Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Wright v. RoseberrySupreme Court of the United States · 1887
- James v. Germania Iron Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1901
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.