Legal Opinion

State v. Mattila

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided June 15, 1981No. L 30854, 30855, CA 19537PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGillette, P. J.

In this criminal case defendant was convicted of Driving Under the Influence of Intoxicants, ORS 487.540, and Hit and Run (Unattended Vehicle). ORS 483.604. Both are Class A traffic infractions. Defendant had previously been convicted of Driving Under the Influence in December, 1977. After a jury had found defendant guilty of the principal charges, the trial court found the prior conviction to be constitutionally valid. It was then used to enhance the principal charges to Class A misdemeanors. ORS 484.365(1). Defendant appeals. We reverse and remand for resentencing.

In his first assignment of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Burgett v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Swift & Co. v. WickhamSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  3. State v. FogleOregon Supreme Court · 1969
  4. State v. GrenvikOregon Supreme Court · 1981
  5. State v. KaserCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1973

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. WatsonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1988
  2. State v. WrightCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1983
  3. Matteson v. State Board of ParoleCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1981
  4. State v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1982
  5. State v. ParksCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API