Legal Opinion

French v. Sabey Corp.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided February 26, 1998No. 65221-0PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTalmadge, J.

We are asked to decide if the statute of *549frauds, RCW 19.36.010, requires a personal services contract of a set duration in excess of one year to be in writing if the contract is terminable on six months’ notice or is partially performed. Neither partial performance nor the fact that a party may at its option terminate the contract within a year relieves the parties of the statutory obligation to put a personal services agreement in writing. The personal services contract here was void because it violated RCW 19.36.010. We affirm the trial court’s summary judgment in favor of Sabey Corporation.

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Klinke v. Famous Recipe Fried Chicken, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Miller v. McCamishWashington Supreme Court · 1971
  3. Von Herberg v. Von HerbergWashington Supreme Court · 1940
  4. Greaves v. Medical Imaging System, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Union Savings & Trust Co. v. KrummWashington Supreme Court · 1915

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Zuver v. Airtouch Communications, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Zuver v. Airtouch Communications, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2004
  3. State v. PlaggemeierCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1999
  4. French v. SABEY CORPORATIONWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Professional Bull Riders, Inc. v. AutoZone, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API