Legal Opinion
Professional Bull Riders, Inc. v. AutoZone, Inc.
Supreme Court of Colorado
Decided June 13, 2005No. 05SA30PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
COATS, Justice.
Pursuant to 10th Cir. R. 27.1, The United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit certified to this court the following question:
Under Col.Rev.Stat. § 38-10-112(l)(a), is an oral agreement void when: (1) the agreement contemplates performance for a definite period of more than one year but (2) allows the party to be charged an option to terminate the agreement by a certain date less than a year from the making of the agreement and when (3) the party to be charged has not exercised that option to terminate the agreement?
Pursuant to C.A.R. 21.1, we agreed to answer the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Cron v. Hargro Fabrics, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1998
- Kiely v. St. GermainSupreme Court of Colorado · 1983
- Hopper v. Lennen & Mitchell, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1944
- Klinke v. Famous Recipe Fried Chicken, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1979
- Johnston v. BowersockSupreme Court of Kansas · 1900
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Vinton v. Adam Aircraft Industries, Inc.District Court, D. Colorado · 2005
- Ed Dewitte Ins. Agency, Inc. v. Fin. Assocs. Midwest, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2018
- Larrieu v. Best Buy Stores, L.P.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2012