Legal Opinion
Hicks v. Missouri Pacific Railroad Company
District Court, W.D. Arkansas
Decided March 11, 1960No. 862PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HENLEY, District Judge.
On motion of the defendant for summary judgment and on cross motion of the plaintiffs for partial summary judgment.
This is an action brought by Eula Mae Hicks, as administratrix of the estate of Jimmie Hicks, deceased, and by Eula Mae Hicks in her own right, Catherine Hicks Moody, Lorine Hicks Hall, and Hazel Jean Hicks, against the defendant, Missouri Pacific Railroad Company, to recover damages on account of alleged personal injuries to and the death of Jimmie Hicks, which death occurred on Oe-tober 27, 1956, as a result of an accident which happened in the yards of…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Street v. Consumers Mining Corp.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1946
- Davis v. RailwaySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1890
- Field v. Gazette Publishing Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1933
- Anthony v. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1913
- Smith v. Missouri Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1927
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Russell v. Ingersoll-Rand Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1992
- McDonald v. PettusSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1999
- Matthews v. Travelers Indemnity Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1968
- Simmons First National Bank v. AbbottSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1986
- Joseph A. Orlando and Anna L. Orlando v. Tony Alamo, Susan Alamo and the Tony and Susan Alamo FoundationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1981
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.