American Financial Services Ass'n v. City of Cleveland
Ohio Supreme Court
1Concurring in the judgmentO’Connor, J.
{¶ 50} I agree with the majority that a court must look at a comprehensive regulatory enactment as a whole when determining whether R.C. 1.63 is a general law. I write separately, however, because I believe that the concept of preemption should play a greater role in the analysis of the ordinances in question.
Preemption in Ohio
{¶ 51} Despite the fact that law of federal preemption is well settled, this court has never adequately explained how the concept of preemption applies in Ohio. Federal legislative preemption power is derived from the Supremacy Clause of the United States Constitution.…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Jones v. Rath Packing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Hillsborough County v. Automated Medical Laboratories, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- State ex rel. Evans v. MooreOhio Supreme Court · 1982
- American Financial Services Ass'n v. City of OaklandCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005
- State Ex Rel. Hackley v. EdmondsOhio Supreme Court · 1948
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.