Legal Opinion · Concurring in the judgment

American Financial Services Ass'n v. City of Cleveland

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided November 20, 2006No. Nos. 2005-0160 and 2005-0161Published

1Concurring in the judgmentO’Connor, J.

{¶ 50} I agree with the majority that a court must look at a comprehensive regulatory enactment as a whole when determining whether R.C. 1.63 is a general law. I write separately, however, because I believe that the concept of preemption should play a greater role in the analysis of the ordinances in question.

Preemption in Ohio

{¶ 51} Despite the fact that law of federal preemption is well settled, this court has never adequately explained how the concept of preemption applies in Ohio. Federal legislative preemption power is derived from the Supremacy Clause of the United States Constitution.…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Jones v. Rath Packing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
  2. Hillsborough County v. Automated Medical Laboratories, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. State ex rel. Evans v. MooreOhio Supreme Court · 1982
  4. American Financial Services Ass'n v. City of OaklandCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005
  5. State Ex Rel. Hackley v. EdmondsOhio Supreme Court · 1948

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API