Mark Edward Swedzinski v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
BOWMAN, Chief Judge.
Mark Edward Swedzinski appeals the District Court’s 1 denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion for post-conviction relief. He argues that his conviction for violating 18 U.S.C. § 924(c) should be vacated because the jury instructions defining “use” of a firearm were contrary to the Supreme Court’s decision in Bailey v. United States, 516 U.S. 137, 116 S.Ct. 501, 138 L.Ed.2d 472 (1995). We affirm.
I
On. September 20, 1991,, agents of the Minnesota Bureau of Criminal Apprehension located a plot of cultivated marijuana in Lincoln County, Minnesota. During surveillance of the area…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- United States v. FradySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Bailey v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Muscarello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- United States v. Allen H. McKinneyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1997
- Robert Rydell Williams v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1996
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Eric A. Moore v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1999
- David W. Johnson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2002
- United States v. Dale Lynn RyanCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2000
- Arnold F. Hohn v. United States of America,appelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1999
- United States v. LefkowitzDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2003
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.