United States v. Lefkowitz
District Court, D. Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
DOTY, District Judge.
This matter is before the court upon defendant’s motion for relief from a sentence in a criminal ease pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255. For the following reasons, defendant’s motion is denied.
BACKGROUND
I. Facts
Because the factual background is fully set forth in the record, a summary of the facts is sufficient for purposes of the present motion. Defendant and his company, Citi-Equity Group (“CEG”), built or developed low to moderate income housing complexes that purportedly qualified for low income housing tax credits. Defendant and CEG offered investment opportunities…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- United States v. GallantCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008
- Gary Lefkowitz v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2006
- United States v. One StarDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 2008
- Gary Lefkowitz v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2006
- Granados (Richard) Vs. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2020
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.