Legal Opinion

Tome v. Berea Pewter Mug, Inc.

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided June 17, 1982No. 44100PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Appellants, Michael Tome and Phillip (Danny) White, instituted this suit for damages against appellee Berea Pewter Mug, Inc., the owner and operator of a tavern located in Berea, Ohio. The appellee filed a motion for summary judgment on the ground that both Tome and White were guilty of contributory negligence and assumption of the risk. The trial court entered judgment for the appellee without issuing an opinion. On appeal, appellants Tome and White contend that there remain genuine issues of fact for trial, and that appellee is not entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Summary judgment is…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Scott v. GardnerTexas Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Powell v. BerrySupreme Court of Georgia · 1916
  3. Patton v. Pennsylvania Rd. Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1939
  4. Denicola v. Providence HospitalOhio Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Benjamin v. Deffet Rentals, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1981

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Lee v. Kiku RestaurantSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1992
  2. Sheehan v. THE NORTH AMERICAN MARKETING CORP.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2010
  3. Del E. Webb v. Superior Court of ArizonaArizona Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Bennett v. 2 Poor White Boys, Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1998
  5. Mann v. GrayDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1985

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API