Legal Opinion

Ætna Life Ins. v. Braukman

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided May 1, 1934No. Nos. 969, 972PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KENNEDY, District Judge.

The above-entitled causes were presented together upon the appeal, for the reason that the identical point is present in each case, with one additional point in the ¿Etna ease relating to interest.

The controversy involves life insurance policies carrying indemnity clauses providing for the double payment of the amount of the face of the policy in the event the insured died through accidental means. The insured here had the same type of policy in the two companies, who are appellants, and therefore the facts concerning the death are applicable in each case. The causes…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Whitfield v. Aetna Life Ins. Co. of HartfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
  2. Brunswick v. Standard Accident InsuranceSupreme Court of Missouri · 1919
  3. Logan v. Fidelity & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1898
  4. Aufrichtig v. Columbia National Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Missouri · 1923
  5. Andrus v. Business Men's Accident Ass'n of AmericaSupreme Court of Missouri · 1920

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. v. New York Life Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Colorado · 2018
  2. Metropolitan Life Insurance Co. v. RosierSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1941
  3. Nagel v. Provident Mutual Life Insurance Co. of PhiladelphiaMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2001
  4. Thompson v. New York Life Ins. Co.District Court, E.D. Oklahoma · 1935
  5. Amica Life Insurance Co. v. WertzDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2017

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API